Jump to content
In this section we have spot diagnoses posted on a daily basis since June 2010, now over 4000! You can review the archived cases and read the suggested diagnoses by users and the final comment by the contributors.
Case are uploaded each week day by 10 am UK time with the correct diagnosis will generally be posted at 8 pm UK time. Why not view the most recent spot diagnosis and proffer a diagnosis?

Case Number : Case 337 Posted By: Admin_Dermpath

Please read the clinical history and view the images by clicking on them before you proffer your diagnosis.
Submitted Date :
   (0 reviews)

Female 78 years, rapidly growing purple plaque on cheek.


  Report Record

User Feedback


Admin_Dermpath

Posted

Phillip McKee - Overseas consultations (Cave Creek, Arizona, USA) Wrote:

Yes, angiosarcoma. There really isn't any differential diagnosis. Have a great weekend. Phillip

Submitted on 23/09/2011 17:40
________________________________________

Amira Tawdy - Cairo University (Egypt) Wrote:

Angiosarcoma

Submitted on 23/09/2011 15:46
________________________________________

Eman El-Nabarawy - Cairo University (Egypt) Wrote:

Dear sir,we are waiting for the answer of the very difficult yesterday case.thanks.

Submitted on 23/09/2011 10:51
________________________________________

Juan Carlos Garcés - Hospital Oncológico / Hospital Luis Vernaza (Guayaquil Ecuador) Wrote:

Angiosarcoma

Submitted on 23/09/2011 09:09
________________________________________

Pablo Ortega - "Isidro Ayora" Hospital (Loja-Ecuador) Wrote:

agree with all

Submitted on 23/09/2011 08:01
________________________________________

Luis Briones - () Wrote:

WELL DIFFERENTIATED ANGIOSARCOMA

Submitted on 23/09/2011 07:27
________________________________________

Bostjan Luzar - Institute of Pathology, Medical Faculty University of Ljubljana (Ljubljana, Slovenia) Wrote:

Retiform growth pattern, mostly lined by a single layer of endothelial cells. However, Fig 3 shows nuclear hyperchromasia and possibly multilayering, therefore angiosarcoma seems to be the only option.

Submitted on 23/09/2011 06:46
________________________________________

Francisco Vilchez - Department of Dermatology. Virgen de la Victoria Clinical Universitary Hospital. (Málaga (Spain)) Wrote:

Angiosarcoma

Submitted on 23/09/2011 06:38
________________________________________

ANDREW DANCKWERTS - NHLS / WITS UNIVERSITY (PORT ELIZABETH, RSA) Wrote:

WELL DIFFERENTIATED ANGIOSARCOMA.

Submitted on 23/09/2011 05:33
________________________________________

Marwa Fawzi - Dermatology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University (Egypt) Wrote:

Angiosarcoma

Submitted on 23/09/2011 05:25
________________________________________

Marcela Saeb Lima - INCMNSZ (Mexico City) Wrote:

Angiosarcoma

Submitted on 23/09/2011 05:02
________________________________________

Mona Abdel Halim - Dermatology Dept. Cairo University (Egypt) Wrote:

Well differentiated angiosarcoma..

Submitted on 23/09/2011 04:59
________________________________________

Mona Abdel Halim - Dermatology Dept. Cairo University (Egypt) Wrote:

Well differentiated angiosarcoma..

Submitted on 23/09/2011 04:59
________________________________________

Eman El-Nabarawy - Cairo University (Egypt) Wrote:

Angiosarcoma.

Submitted on 23/09/2011 04:56
________________________________________

Share this comment


Link to comment
share_externally


×
×
  • Create New...