Case Number : Case 340 Posted By: Guest

Phillip McKee - Overseas consultations (Cave Creek, Arizona, USA) Wrote:

Well done everyone. Spiradenocarcinoma is correct. The upper two images show a pre-existent telangiectatic spiradenoma. I don't recognize a category of mitotically active spiradenoma.

Submitted on 28/09/2011 12:50
________________________________________

Mona Abdel Halim - Dermatology Dept., Cairo University (Egypt) Wrote:

My first impression was telangiectatic spiradenoma, After reading the comments and revising the images, I found several mitotic figures, they look typical, The cells do not look pleomorphic, I favor mitotically active spiradenoma. The clinical picture of spiradenocarcinoma is that of a long lasting lesion that underwent sudden enlargement. Nice case!,,

Submitted on 28/09/2011 09:36
________________________________________

Eman El-Nabarawy - Cairo University (Egypt) Wrote:

Spiradenocarcinoma.

Submitted on 28/09/2011 08:58
________________________________________

Rodrigo Restrepo - UPB/CES (Mdlln/Col) Wrote:

Spiradenocarcinoma

Submitted on 28/09/2011 08:30
________________________________________

Richard Carr - Warwick (UK) Wrote:

I would have been happy to call it a mitotoically active spiradenoma based on this morphology. I know I am a lot less malignant than some on adnexal tumours. Probably because I have not seen enough cases going bad!!

Submitted on 28/09/2011 08:17
________________________________________

Marcela Saeb Lima - INCMNSZ (Mexico City) Wrote:

Spiradenocarcinoma ex telangiectatic spiradenoma

Submitted on 28/09/2011 06:36
Bostjan Luzar - Institute of Pathology, Medical Faculty University of Ljubljana (Ljubljana, Slovenia) Wrote:

Spiradenocarcinoma

Submitted on 28/09/2011 05:34
________________________________________