Jump to content
In this section we have spot diagnoses posted on a daily basis since June 2010, now over 4000! You can review the archived cases and read the suggested diagnoses by users and the final comment by the contributors.
Case are uploaded each week day by 10 am UK time with the correct diagnosis will generally be posted at 8 pm UK time. Why not view the most recent spot diagnosis and proffer a diagnosis?

Case Number : Case 1367 - 18 September Posted By: Guest

Please read the clinical history and view the images by clicking on them before you proffer your diagnosis.
Submitted Date :
   (0 reviews)

F65. Skin tag on back, 5 years.

Case posted by Dr Richard Carr


  Report Record

User Feedback


Dr. Mona Abdel-Halim

Posted

Pleomorphic fibroma. According to McKee's pathology of skin, similar cases have been reported as "pseudosarcomatous polyp"

Share this comment


Link to comment
share_externally

Guest Romualdo

Posted

Pleomorphic fibroma is also my preferred diagnosis.

Share this comment


Link to comment
share_externally

Arti Bakshi

Posted

Yes, certainly pleomorphic fibroma is the first thought with the polypoid architecture, bizarre pleomorhic cells and collagen.
Just worried a bit about the atypical mitoses. I know that 'rare' mitoses are allowed in pleomorhic fibroma, but there are 3 quite clearly seen (and all atypical!) in the images. But cant come up with any alternative diagnosis!

Share this comment


Link to comment
share_externally

Guest Romualdo

Posted

Arti, maybe these are not true atypical mitotic figures but degenerating caryorrhectic nuclei simulating them. A very low proliferative index (Ki67) would help to reassure the diagnosis of benignancy.

Share this comment


Link to comment
share_externally

Dr. Richard Carr

Posted

My report:
Skin tag with unusually prominent hyperchromatic and multinucleate cells
(pleomorphic fibroma). Surprisingly, we identified 3 mitotic figures.
If the lesion recurs , complete excision with clear margin would be
recommended.

I did not do a Ki67 but these are textbook mitotic figures and I agree they are all atypical. Clearly "multinucleate" cells can only produce atypical mitotic figures but I don't think in the context of an otherwise benign appearing lesion it affects the favoured benign interpretation but you can see how I expressed slight uncertainty in the report with specific advice just in case!!

Share this comment


Link to comment
share_externally



Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...