Jump to content
In this section we have spot diagnoses posted on a daily basis since June 2010, now over 1700! You can review the archived cases and read the suggested diagnoses by users and the final comment by Dr Uma Sundram, the Editor-in-Chief and main spot diagnosis host. Case are uploaded each week day by 10 a.m. UK time with the correct diagnosis will generally be posted at 8 p.m. UK time. Why not view the most recent spot diagnosis and proffer a diagnosis?

Case Number : Case 1737 - 24 January - Dr Uma Sundram Posted By: Guest

Please read the clinical history and view the images by clicking on them before you proffer your diagnosis.
Submitted Date :
   (0 reviews)

Clinical History: 49 year old woman with left anterior tibial lesion.

Case Posted by Dr Uma Sundram


  Report Record

User Feedback


Admin_Dermpath

Posted

I have a busy day tomorrow so here is Dr Uma Sundram's Spot Diagnosis Case a little early.

 

Geoff Cross - DermpathPRO Projects

Share this comment


Link to comment
share_externally

Arash Daryakar

Posted

Hard case. infiltrative epithelioid histiocytic like lesion with extension to subcutaneous fat and lymphophagocytosis(?).

i have no idea about cell proliferative activity . but i would like to include histiocytic sarcoma and deep fibrous hisiocytoma in differentials.

I wish  to know expression of  histocytic and also melanocytic markers to determine line of differetiation.

Share this comment


Link to comment
share_externally

Raul Perret

Posted

Due to the epidermal hyperplasia, presence of hemosiderine deposits and xanthomized cells in pic 5? I would consider dermatofibroma as the first diagnosis. In addition the cellularity and deep extension are seen in the cellular variant, cd34 should be performed. The presence of lymphoid nodules can be seen in df also but should always inspect them well to avoid a misdiagnosis of a lymphoma/leukemia (mainly LLC). 

Share this comment


Link to comment
share_externally

Dimitris Chatzianastasiou

Posted

Fascinating little thing...
Indeed on low power it recapitulates the pattern of a dermatofibroma with some layering (over fascicular intersecting pattern). However, in high power and deep lesional images it shows some vascular qualities with epitheloid/histiocytoid cells, possible intracytoplasmic vacuolation, scattered multinucleated cell forms. I m puzzled by the fact it spreads within the fat lobules, not only along the septa. The lymphoid hyperplasia appears vasculocentric and "out of the blue". No eosinophils.
I would have asked for immunos (eg. CD34, FactorXIIIa, CD68, CD163, CD31, ERG) to see if I could end up favouring an epitheloid/histiocytoid hemangioma or some dermatofibroma variant.
Lets see...

Share this comment


Link to comment
share_externally

Dr. Mona Abdel-Halim

Posted

I am sharing with Raul the same line of thinking, I believe this is cellular DF with giant cells and lymphoid infiltrate. But it is good to verify the lymphoid cells with caution, maybe do some IHC... 

Share this comment


Link to comment
share_externally

vincenzo polizzi

Posted

Dermatofibroma, with subcutaneous extension and lymphoid nodular reaction at the bottom of the lesion ( well known host abnormal reaction in this tumor        ( Inflammatory lymphadenoid reactions with dermatofibroma/histiocytoma https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3016046.).

Agre with Raul: there are histiocytoid cells rather than slender hypercromatic and fibroblastic of DFSP.

It needs IHC off course, but I consider unlikely CLL/SCL in this setting, because the infiltration of CLL is usually interstitial between adipocytes and radiating from nodules rather than well circumscribed micro nodular as here,...but "unlikely" doesn't mean impossible...

Share this comment


Link to comment
share_externally

I believe this is a case of Deep DFB, but I would perform immunostains to exclude DFSP. I think that this infiltrate deep to the tumor is not concerning. CD34 and CD10 are a good choice for the differential, in my opinion.

Share this comment


Link to comment
share_externally

drdeepajacob

Posted

Deep cellular DF or a DFSP. But would always prefer to exclude a melanoma ( just a trainees thought)

Share this comment


Link to comment
share_externally

Alice Roberts

Posted

Cellular DF. Would do F13A, CD34 and S100 to confirm.

Share this comment


Link to comment
share_externally

Dr. Richard Carr

Posted

Nice discussion but I was thinking I'd be happy with dermatofibroma (subcutaneous extension).

Share this comment


Link to comment
share_externally

Nitin Khirwadkar

Posted

I think this is a cellular DF with deep extension. Typical epidermal changes. Would definitely do a CD34.

Share this comment


Link to comment
share_externally

Uma Sundram

Posted

Thanks everyone, great job. I fully concur with the ddx of cellular DF, DFSP, and possibly unusual desmoplastic melanoma (thank you trainee!). There are no secret traps here, factor 13a was positive and CD34 and S100 were negative. The lymphoid aggregates were non neoplastic. However, I think it's easy to get side tracked by the extensive infiltration into fat and the presence of lymphoid aggregates, so wanted to show a case that can have some confusing features which often leads to a send out to an expert.

Share this comment


Link to comment
share_externally



Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...